Jun 27 2009
YOU ASKED FOR IT AMERICA, NOW YOU GOT IT!
You asked for it now you got it. You wanted change because being safe from terror attacks sucked. You wanted change because pouring water on a terrorist head was torture. You wanted change because who needs free will. You wanted change because you’re ignorant! Well here’s the change you’re getting. MARXISM! Read about it, understand it, because you’ve got it. Government run industry, finance an absolute rule by keeping you dependent on the Government for everything. Let’s start with industry. 2 of the 3 major American car companies have been taken over by the Government. Finance, banks are being regulated and endentured by the Government. Healthcare now GOD a.k.a Obama and his henchmen and women are shoving a 2 TRILLION dollar trainwreck down your throats. A ridiculous greenhouse bill that will send your energy bills skyrocketing. Global warming isn’t real, I live in the midwest it’s is getting colder here every winter and winter used to last 3 months now it lasts 6 months, not Global warming but more like another ICE AGE. I used to try and tell people what the Government was doing just to wake them up. I realize now it is useless the majority of Americans are just stupid! It doesn’t take a genius to understand what is taking place, right in front of you but there is still no outrage. GOD a.k.a. Obama is making the same mistakes that have been tried and failed around the world. But he is GOD so anything he thinks is right can’t fail. I would equate him to the anti-christ, read the book of revelations and see if he doesn’t fit the profile. You asked for it now it’s here. Higher taxes, double digit inflation, food and gas shortages, anarchy! You thought it was bad when Bush was in office, you ain’t seen bad yet. GOD a.k.a. Obama and his henchmen and women are in an all out sprint to strip Americans of every freedom and liberty. They have already taken all the money, wheres that stimulus package? Wheres the new jobs? Wheres the recovery? It’s in his and his henchmen and womens pockets. Way to go America, you wanted change now see if you can live with it.
I was wondering if you would be kind enough to tell me what percentage of Chrysler does the U.S. now own. Since you contend that the government has “taken over” Chrysler and I’m just an ignorant American; I was hoping you could enlighten me given my mental limitations. Thank you very much for your anticipated assistance.
“Turin-based Fiat, which recently took control of U.S. car maker Chrysler LLC, is in the process of drawing up plans to retool its Italian plants as the car maker seeks to cut costs and expand abroad to better cope with the economic crisis.”
Just trying to help you out. I had to have my wife help me cuz she’s really, really smart like you.
” The workers are now, finally, significant owners of the means of production. The United Auto Workers control about 65 percent of Chrysler and 17.5 percent of General Motors.”
More help from my perty smart wife. She told me I was being mean so I’ll answer the question for you. The government owns less than 6% of Chrysler.
http://www.slate.com/id/2219607 The 65% you say the UAW owns will only become theirs when they repay all the Government loans. SO the Government still owns 75% of Chrysler since they also have 10% ownership from here to eternity. The Government also appoints the majority of the board. Tell your wife she needs to brush up on her math.
Ignoring the facts? I just gave you the facts!!! You truly are hopeless. One last try-how about providing a source that states how much of Chrysler the government owns? I won’t hold my breath. If you’re true to form; you’ll come back with another verbal attack that is completely off the point. Don’t let me down now! LOL. BTW-the day I need help from the likes of you; I promise to pack it in. Why not read some of the other posts today from people like the “naked emperor” or” nobebop”? They are both supported by actual facts and sources aside from being extremely well written. You might actually learn something about posting an accurate and defensible article. Trust me; until then, no one is taking anything you have to say seriously.
I’m guessing those eleven thousand jobs, the government saved while sending the rest to Mexico, belong to that 65 percent of auto workers that Tailback is refering to…hm, facts seem to elude the liberals, and the rest (God help them) have gone through the ultra-liberal school system, so waking anyone up is difficult..but good try, I’m with you. Hang in there, maybe when they’re standing in lines for loaves of bread, they will realize what being a smarta** is really worth.
Perhaps one of you could address the original point. How has the government taken control of Chrysler with a 6% share in it. @dfallis-Please tell me what facts I’m eluding. Are you saying that Fiat and the UAW do not have the controlling interest in Chrysler? If you are; then I would suggest instead of accusing everyone of being a liberal who doesn’t agree with you-do some homework and come back with some info on my original argument. @druskdlr-No I don’t take you seriously. I just enjoy exposing your false and baseless assertions.
Chrysler shuts Mexico plants due to parts shortage
www.chinaview.cn 2009-05-29 11:01:22 Print
MEXICO CITY, May 28 (Xinhua) — U.S. automaker Chrysler announced on Thursday it had suspended production at all Mexican plants due to a lack of U.S.-made parts.
“We have had to stop because some of the components we get here are made in U.S. plants where they had had to stop work,” said a spokesman for Chrysler in Mexico.
Chrysler has filed for bankruptcy protection in the United States, a legal procedure that will protect it from creditors for a limited time when it restructures.
Chrysler is waiting for a bankruptcy court ruling on its revival plan that will create a partnership with Italy’s Fiat.
The U.S. automaker has a total of 5,000 employees in three plants in Mexico.
Hmmm-where are those thousands of jobs? You also might want to look at http://www.allpar.com/world/mexico.html. It would appear that your contention that thousands of Chrysler jobs were sent to Mexico is complete bullshit-not surprising. So, unless I’m reading this wrong, as of 3 1/2 weeks ago; Chrysler had a total of 5,000 employees in Mexico. Well, as numbnuts pointed out; most Americans are stupid so maybe one of you geniuses could interpret it for me. Thanks guys.
BTW- the link I provided explains the history of Chrysler in Mexico, which dates back to pre 60s. Interesting!
Exactly what I expected from you. Avoid the facts and respond with some ignorant racist comment. Once again; you didn’t let me down. You just make it far too easy-it’s not even fun anymore. Time for you to prepare your next inspirational (baseless) post. I’d advice you to research your next rant but why waste my breath? Good night dipshit.
How fortunate you are that are just anther online windbag. Now you go from making racist comments to insulting my wife. Stay in Kansas little boy where you’re safe. You have been proven wrong in every single post you have submitted including this one. We are still waiting for your source stating that the government controls Chrysler but, as always, you never produce. Punks like you need a forum such as this because if you ever said something about my wife to my face: I guarantee you would never be able to post again. Most MEN know never to insult another man’s wife, sister,or mother. The key word there is MEN so it obviously doesn’t include you. Way to stay on point you little puke. In a perfect world; you would walk into my dojo and that would be the end of it.
I wouldn’t be looking to dfallis for help. You crossed a line and though I may disagree with dfallis on this particular issue; he doesn’t strike me as the type who would back a punk who stoops as low as you do. BTW- I don’t need the internet to be a badass. I’ve crippled pieces of shit like you for comments such as yours. Since you began posting; you have been thoroughly and soundly beaten by myself, Jason, dsent and others. The reason for that is simple; you don’t know how to support your arguments with anything other than personal attacks such as your racist comment. Now you have crossed a line that any fellow blogger would perceive as classless. As I said: Stay in Kansas puke-you’re safe there. As far as my wife being a dipshit; one would think a Master’s Degree and being an Orthopedic PA would trump your limited knowledge of ANYTHING.
# druskdlron 17 Jun 2009 at 7:13 pm edit this
“You are right some very questionable practices. I have discovered recently that the Dem’s have practiced this since the 1780’s. I am currently reading and writing a paper about the Whiskey Rebellion authored by William Hogeland. Reading this book reveals the depths to which the Democratic party has sunk for over 200 years. Beginning with Alexander Hamilton, Robert Morris, General Horatio Gates and even George Washington to a lesser extent.’
This is one from one of your earlier, baseless posts. In it; you state that we should study history so we don’t repeat our mistakes. Well, you should have done a little studying yourself. The Democratic Party wasn’t formed until the 1790s at which time it was called the Democratic-Republican Party. More importantly; it was formed to oppose Alexander Hamilton’s fiscal policies. My god boy: Do you get anything right? LMAO
I’m sure you’ll come back with some attack on me or my wife. Why not try a new approach and support your argument with something concrete?
Main article: History of the United States Democratic Party
“The Democratic Party evolved from Anti-Federalist factions that opposed the fiscal policies of Alexander Hamilton in the early 1790s.”
LOL. You just can’t seem to get anything right. Next you’re going to tell me ANTI-FEDERALISTS is the same as FEDERALISTS. You truly are pitiful. Even though I cited a source that explained the party was formed to oppose Alexander Hamilton’s policies; you still go on to support MY claim that the original Dems opposed Hamilton which completely refutes your original argument. Don’t you ever get tired of looking like a jackass?
I do write my own blogs. The difference is mine are based on research as well as ideology. Trust me; they’re far too deep and supported for you to comment on them but go ahead-give it a try. I will continue to tear apart every one of your posts except those that are based on facts or empirical data. Ooops-I forgot; you don’t employ that approach when writing your nauseating rants. FEDERALISTS-LMAO!
I’m fuckin dying to see what kind of bullshit you’re going to come up with for being exposed yet again.
Once again; thanks for not letting me down. You didn’t address the blatant error you made; confusing ANTI-FEDERALISTS with FEDERALISTS. I don’t blame you there-it can’t be easy being exposed as a baseless idiot time after time after time. Again with the liberal rhetoric! Anyone who opposes you, or in this case, points out your inability to understand the meaning of anti, must be a liberal. I don’t watch much TV-I do however read the Washington Post, NY Times, LA Times, and Chicago Tribune online daily. I also subscribe to both Newsweek and Time which I receive weekly via the mail. Let me guess-you watch FOX News and only FOX News daily. Even the book you cited by Hogeland is based on the Whiskey Rebellion and doesn’t even mention the Democrats or the Anti-Federalists. Go to http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig7/hogeland1.html. It’s in your boy’s own words. It’s one thing to be a bit slow but you actually make shit up. You are a bigot as exemplified by your Mexican comment and your Muslim references. Couple that with your complete and blatant ineptness as far as carrying on an informed debate; I must use the words of my good friend: YOU ARE DISMISSED!! I happen to be a very tolerant person and am man enough to admit when I’m wrong as I did in one of your puke infested posts. However; I was apologizing to dfallis who made an excellent point that I was not aware of. Of course; this is the post where you based a person’s ability on their looks. What a fuckin joke you are! I welcome a fight with you. I only wish it could be face to face-it wouldn’t last long. Keep posting baseless and fabricated information and I’ll keep calling you out on it with supported arguments. I have no problem with your ideology-you’re certainly entitled to that. I do take exception with people who try to push their agendas with inaccurate or fabricated statements. AND YOU ARE THE KING WHEN IT COMES TO THAT. So bring it on Junior-I have 10 year old students who can give me a better fight (metaphorically speaking).
straight madness - Bush started the bailouts - the people demanded oversight - changes were desired for those who voted for Obama yet now that they are happening people want to sit in judgement. Jealous people started the rumor that Obama was the messiah, the second coming, God himself because he spoke to the spirit of the people and the people listened and voted him into office - now he is the anti-christ, a socialist, a Muslim and now a Marxist even. This was truly an insane rant!!! Unf***ing believeable
druskadiddler,
WTF is wrong with you? You insult peoples wives? Really thats just pathetic. You cant hold your own in debate so you attack someone you don’t know in an attempt to hurt their feelings. Are you really so lame and weak? You act like a child in this venue but elevate yourself as though you were some type of movement leader but when you cant go up against your opponet verbally you cower behind insults. Reminds me of Thoreau ” just as boys, if they cannot come at some person against whom they have a spite, will abuse his dog.” You are a coward sir and you best hope you never run into tailback in person as I have little doubt he will smack the fuckin taste out of your bitch mouth.
So you come on here to insult me for insulting someone else? Talk about pathetic. FYI I didn’t start the insults I just wrote a blog. I wrote about what is really happening as opposed to what Liberals want you to believe is happening. I know the truth is inconvenient for the Dems and the Liberals who support them but hey you got enough lemmings to follow along and elect a person clearly is not qualified.